Records – Nikomahova etika. . Ética a Nicómaco. Aristóteles. Ética. []: Julio Pallí Bonet & Tomás Calvo Martínez · Introduction Teresa Martínez. Aristóteles. Koloreei Aristotel. Nikomahova etika. Ética a Nicòmac: libres I, VI i X. []: Carles Miralles · Introduction – Comments Salvador Feliu Castelló. “Aristóteles y los publicistas. El anuncio de televisión como “Aristoteles Etica a Nicomaco” · “Aristoteles Etica Nicomaque ” – “Aristoteles over de vrouw [.

Author: Gudal Togami
Country: Azerbaijan
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Life
Published (Last): 22 September 2004
Pages: 107
PDF File Size: 4.17 Mb
ePub File Size: 6.82 Mb
ISBN: 638-8-66652-972-3
Downloads: 82095
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Yozshulmaran

Some desires like that of food and drink, and indeed sex, are shared by everyone in a certain way. Distributive Nikomahovaa Geometric proportion: He also asserts as part of this starting point that virtue for a human must involve reason in thought and speech logosas this is an aspect an ergonliterally meaning a task or work of human living. Book IV Chapter 8. Aristotle does not deny anger a place in the behavior of a good person, but says it should be “on the right grounds and against the right persons, and also in the right manner and nikomaahova the right moment and for the right length of time”.

This is a virtue we observe when we see how people act with regards to giving money, and things whose worth is thought of in terms of money. In the Sachs translation it is remarked that two possible translations “pride” nikomahiva “high mindedness” both only get half of the meaning, while magnanimity only “shifts the problem into Latin”.

Opinions about the relationship between the two works—for example, which was written first, and which originally contained the three common books, are divided.

Such arisstoteles injustice” is always greed aimed at particular good nikomzhova such as honor or money or security. Finally, Aristotle repeats that the discussion of the Ethics has not reached its aim if it has no effect in practice. Corrective Justice Arithmetic proportion: Aristotle therefore names the virtuous man as a person who claims the good qualities he has without exaggeration or understatement. Stinginess is most obviously taking money too seriously, but wastefulness, less strictly speaking, is not always the opposite an under estimation of the importance of money because it is also often caused by being unrestrained.

The obsequious areskos person is over-concerned with the pain they cause others, backing down too easily, even when it is dishonorable or harmful to do so, while a surly duskolos or quarrelsome dusteris person objects to everything and does not care what pain nikoamhova cause others, never compromising.


Amina Memic | University of Sarajevo –

The temperate person desires the things that are not impediments to health, nor contrary to what is beautiful, nor beyond that person’s resources. Finally, Aristotle turns to the idea that reciprocity “an eye for an eye ” is justice, an idea he associates with the Pythagoreans.

As in the examples above, overconfident people are likely to be called courageous, or considered close to courageous. The aim of magnificence, like any virtue, is beautiful action, not for the magnificent man himself but on public things, such that even his private gifts have some resemblance to votive offerings. Education needs to be more like medicine, with both practice and theory, and this arostoteles a new approach to studying politics.

At one point Aristotle says that examples of areas where dishonest boasting for gain might go undetected, and be very blameworthy, would be prophecy, philosophy, or medicine, all arisyoteles which have both pretense and bragging.

Book IV is sometimes described as being very bound to the norms of an Athenian gentleman in Aristotle’s time. Aristotle then turns to examples, reviewing some of the specific ways that people are thought worthy of blame or praise.

And just as in the previous case concerning flattery, vices that go too far or not far enough might be part of one’s character, or they etic be performed as if they were in character, with aristotelles ulterior motive. As Aristotle points out, his approach is partly because people mean so many different things when they use the word justice. This appears to be a criticism of contemporary sophists.

Ethics, unlike some other types of philosophy, is inexact and uncertain.

File:Aristotelis De Moribus ad Nicomachum.jpg

Milla i Aristotela more. Remember me on this computer. From this starting point, Aristotle goes into discussion of what ethics, a term Aristotle helped develop, means.

However, good habits are described as a precondition for good character. Magnanimity is a latinization of the original Greek used here, which was megalopsuchiawhich means greatness of soul. Some people commit crimes by accident or due to vices other than greed or injustice.

Cowardice for example, might specifically cause a soldier to throw away his shield and run. Strauss describes the Bible as rejecting the concept of a gentleman, nikomabova that this displays aristoteoes different approach to the problem of divine law in Greek and Biblical civilization.

Virtue and vice according to Aristotle are “up to us”. Aristotle says that while both “the truth and one’s friends” are loved, “it is a sacred thing to give the highest honor wristoteles the truth”. The first part relates to members of a community in which it is aristteles for one person to have more or less of a good than another person.


It is concerning this third class of actions that there is doubt about whether they should be praised or blamed or condoned in different cases.

Nicomachean Ethics – Wikipedia

There is one further qualification: Aristotle closes by arguing that in any case, when one considers the virtues in their highest form, they would all exist together. Aristotle makes a nature and nurture distinction between different causes of bestial behavior he says occurs “in some cases from natural disposition, and in others from habit, as with those who have been abused from childhood.

Aristotle focuses from this on to the idea that pleasure is unimpeded, and that while it would make a certain sense for happiness eudaimonia to be a being at work that is unimpeded in some way, being impeded can hardly be good. Chapter 4 states that while most would agree to call the highest aim of humanity eudaimoniaand also to equate this with both living well and doing things well, there is dispute between people, and between the majority hoi polloi and “the wise”.

What is just in distribution must also take into account some sort of worth. A virtuous person feels pleasure when she performs the most beautiful or noble kalos actions.

Aristotle points out that, “Whatever is unfair is lawless, but not everything lawless is unfair,” and, “It would seem that to be a good man is not in every case the same thing as to be a good citizen. Once again trying to describe justice as a mean, he says that “men require a judge to be a middle term or medium—indeed in some places judges are called mediators—, for they think that if they get the mean they will get what is just.

This page was last edited on 29 Novemberat For this reason, Aristotle is sometimes considered a proponent of a doctrine of a golden mean. Friendships of utility are relationships formed without regard to the other person at all. The Good of man is the active exercise of his soul’s faculties in conformity with excellence or virtue, or if there be several human excellences or virtues, in conformity with the best and most perfect among them.