Talmud Jmmanuel Sept. 30, Corey Dear Billy and Christian, Did Jmmanuel study Palibuddhisimus (contact ) when Jmmanuel lived in the far east. Talmud. Jmmanuel. This book is the work of “Billy” Eduard Albert Meier who was born in Bülach, Switzerland in His rather obvious. The Talmud Jmmanuel. Jerusalem, – A Greek Catholic priest, Isa Rashid, discovers a small cave in the slope of a nearby hill. His Swiss friend, “Billy”.
|Genre:||Health and Food|
|Published (Last):||6 March 2006|
|PDF File Size:||17.56 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||6.27 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Billy Meier, The Talmud of Jmmanuel. Reviewed by Robert M. Delving with the Devil. This awful book fully merits the epithets used by Edgar J.
What we are reading represents, we are told with forked tongue in cheek, only the first quarter of the very long text, the rest being destroyed, or so Father Rachid figured, by Israeli troops who were violently pursuing him. You will recognize the implicit element of uncertainty as a rat-hole through which Billy Meier may eventually squeeze the rest of the text if this portion sells well enough.
At least if he can come up with that much baloney.
Full text of “The Talmud Of (PDFy mirror)”
Meier anticipates that the orthodox and the obscurantists will alike denounce his discovery as a hoax p. What does the title mean? We are more familiar with its use referring to the massive collection of Rabbinical law, lore, and commentary, the Talmud of Jerusalem and the Talmud of Babylon.
Another improbability about the frame story: But the Ahmadiyya believe he was crucified and survived, then left the Holy Land to preach for decades longer, eventually winding up in Kashmir, where he died at a ripe, old age orJmmanuel says. This site, though fraudulent, is well known. What was there for Rachid to discover? And did I really say the book is supposed to be the work of Judas Iscariot? The disciple who betrayed Jesus?
This is just unintentionally hilarious!
Jesus as Ventriloquist Dummy. The Talmud of Jmmanuel is structurally just the same as other long-winded gospels like The Aquarian Gospel. It builds on a harmony of the four canonical gospels, hmmanuel and choosing favorite episodes and elements from them, then adding new bits of its own.
The result is a glaring unevenness if quality. Grant me a seeming digression. Scholars have noted a pattern in ancient apocalypses, in which some ancient worthy is depicted as predicting the history of his jnmanuel from ancient times down to the end of the age. Well, of course, the actual author of the document lived at a historical position very close to the end-time his book anticipates. The preceding history matches up because the author knows kmmanuel as history.
He is only pretending to be the ancient character whose name he borrows Daniel, Enoch, Baruch, whomever. So he has perfect hindsight, but jmamnuel he starts venturing real predictions, it is clear blue sky, and he plummets like Icarus. But as soon as they kick away the training wheels, as soon as they stop using tlmud tracing paper, the result is awful. And it is in the new material, obviously, that we have to look to find the main reason for writing the new gospel. What is the new teaching that this gospel wants to ascribe to its Jesus?
First, I think it is pathetic that people resort to such a gimmick. It plainly means the writer knows his ideas would carry no particular conviction if set forth under his own, utterly insignificant name, so maybe hanging them on Jesus will lend the ideas a degree of gravity they would otherwise lack. But he fails to see that the only reason we take seriously the words attributed to Jesus in the traditional Gospels is that they carry their own weight.
By far the most of it has the ring of truth to it, whoever said it. The teaching here is warmed-over Theosophy, but very poorly expressed. But then we are told that it, too, is incomplete and changing It is one without division And if atlmud tap into that fact by enlightened knowledge, we can do pretty much anything That is a prime case of the Division Fallacy in logic: Ralmud may understand the Theory of General Relativity, but it does not follow from talmd that my little finger understands Relativity.
It is substituting fantasy and wishful thinking for knowledge.
So what are we supposed to be doing about it? Well, it is our mission to realize our potential by efforts at self-perfection over the course of many lifetimes. Even Creation a him? To get things straight here: I consider it plausible that extra-terrestrials have visited the earth.
But the possibility, even the plausibility, of it does not entitle us forthwith to believe it is true. There does not yet appear to be compelling evidence for contact with Flying Saucers. But there sure is plenty of evidence that people who claim to be in regular contact with space men are a bunch of delusional nuts. Nor is it their belief in extra-terrestrial visitors what makes them nuts.
Some of these people make wild and extravagant claims that can only proceed from their imagination, at least because they sound like very bad science fiction.
Nursing classic delusions of grandeur, including the persecution complex, Billy predicts his own eventual assassination: Jesus is eventually taken aboard the same craft, much like Brian of Nazareth in the Monty Python movie.
Why bother with Spielbergianism? All science fiction reinterpretation of Christianity, the stock in trade of Flying Saucer religions, entails a dusting off of old eighteenth-century Rationalism: Such science fiction, too, becomes dated and laughable after a while.
And thus UFO theology starts looking even more ridiculous than the supernaturalism it hopes to replace. In this case, the resurrection of Jesus is treated with a technique borrowed from old-time Rationalism rather than its twentieth-century sci-fi counterpart, though.
Usually the eighteenth-century Rationalists had Joseph call upon the Essenes to nurse Jesus back to health, but for some reason they are not good enough this time around.
Why does Billy not allow them a more positive role? Would there really have been time for this? Well, anyway, Joseph gets away with the scheme, despite Jewish and Roman guards at the tomb because he had taken the precaution of designing his tomb with a hidden back entrance! How could he have known this day would come? But txlmud nonsense clashes with the Carbon 14 dating test of the Shroud just as much as the Catholic belief in its genuineness: The Talmud of Jmmanuel is blood-curdlingly anti-Semitic.
Its appropriation of the familiar Jewish title Talmud is offensive, but that is the least of it. Here are a few choice passages: Go to the unenlightened, the idol worshippers and the ignorant after I have left you, because they do not belong to the house of Israel, which will bring ta,mud and bloodshed into the world.
They have acquired this land through ruse and murder in abominable, predatory wars, slaughtering their best friends like wild animals. May the nation of Israel be cursed until the end of the world and never find its peace. Their blood will be shed, because they constantly commit outrages against the laws of Creation.
The Talmud of Jmmanuel
They presume talmus above all the human races as a chosen nation and thus as a separate race. What an evil error jmnanuel what evil presumption, for inasmuch as Israel never was a nation or a race, so it was never a chosen race.
Unfaithful to the laws of Creation, Israel is a mass of people with an inglorious past, characterized by murder and arson. Truly, I say to you: You will find neither txlmud nor peace in the country stolen by your ancestors by means of falsehood and deceit, because you will be haunted by your inherited burden of murder with which your forefathers killed the ancient inhabitants of this continent and deprived them of life and property.
A new man will rise up in this land as a prophet and will rightfully condemn and persecute you and you will have to pay with your blood.
His name will be Mohammed, and his name will bring horror, misery and death to your kind, which you deserve. Truly, truly, I say to you: His name will be written for you with blood, and his hatred against your kind will be endless.
It appears to be Jew-hating, pro-Palestinian propaganda. What we have here is like the Gentile Jesus of the Third Reich theologians. It seems anticlimactic to scrutinize this miserable travesty further. But it may be worth it after all, in case anything else is needful to discourage any adolescents who may still be interested in it. There are historical errors that would just not b possible in a writing from someone who lived in the period.
Jesus is said to be born in the reign of Herod Antipas 2: Actually it was Herod the Great. That was an easy mistake to make, even for a contemporary, as Herod Antipas actually had brothers named Herod Philip and just plain Philip. Obviously Jmmanuel is dependent on the canon, hence by no means an ancient document.
Humble fellow that he is, Billy the Evangelist has Jesus predict him: But Jesus seems to underestimate just how insignificant the man will prove to be. This nonsensical inflation of Mark 6: Jackson repeats again and again in Pulp Fiction! We get a bit of invented soap opera in chapter 16, where it develops that Salome, dancing daughter of Herodias, was in love with the imprisoned John the Baptist and wistfully smooched his severed head.
Corrections of Canonical Gospel Teachings.
Review – Billy Meier, The Talmud of Jmmanuel reviewed by Robert M. Price
The New Testament gospels set the ethical bar pretty high. If your jmkanuel not only does not exceed your grasp, but does not even extend that far, you are just a lazy slob.
In accord with the Rabbis, Jesus seems uncritical in his counsel to give to any beggar. The Rabbis were fully aware that there were cheats.